Welcome to Sana Securities! Login | Subscribe Now.

KSK Energy Equity Research

HomeCompanyKSK Energy Equity Research

Date of Research – 19 January 2016

Price – Rs. 44.00

About the Company

KSK Energy Ventures Limited (“KSK Energy” or the “Company”) is a power projects development company – developing, operating and maintaining power projects. Its customers include both industrial and state-owned consumers in India.

The key current business interests of KSK Energy Ventures Limited are:

► Thermal Power Plants

► Fuel Security

► Renewable Energy

► Support Infrastructure

Currently, the Company operates through (i) 7 power plants (aggregating 1472 MW) including one unit of 600 MW and (ii) 5 remaining units of the 3,600 MW Mahanadi power plant (aggregating 3,000 MW) that are currently under various stages of construction. In addition, certain other thermal, solar and hydro power projects, including outside India, are in various stages of planning.

Key Financial Figures

Consolidated (Rs. Cr)
Particulars FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Total Income from Operations 2,207.02 2,111.80 2,380.43 4,360.31  3,938.58
Expenses 1,388.63 1,574.62 1,891.01 2,768.28  2,659.52  
Earnings Before Other Income, Interest, Tax and Depreciation (Operating Profit) 818.40 537.18 489.42 1,592.03  1,279.06  
Depreciation 226.47 292.97 318.33 536.76  682.27  
Finance Costs 601.77 721.61 1,044.97 1,749.49  2,194.51  
Other income 100.70 136.55 42.37 58.75  163.36  
Exceptional items 0.37 –  (605.52) 
PBT 90.86 (340.85) (831.87) (635.48)  (828.83) 
Tax (76.50) (152.76) (462.35) (141.61)  (136.09) 
PAT (before Minority Interest and share of Associates) 167.35 (188.09) (369.52) (493.87)  (692.75) 
Profit/ (loss) attributable to Minority Interest 16.77 (49.35) (37.66)  – 
Share of profit / (loss) of Associates (25.20) –  6.87  
Consolidated Profit / (Loss) for the year 150.58 (162.89) (320.18) (456.21)  (699.62) 

Profitability Analysis

Consolidated (%)
Particulars FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Operating Profit Margin Ratio 37.08 25.44 20.56 36.51  32.48 
Net Profit Margin Ratio 7.58 (8.91) (15.52) (11.33)  (17.59) 

Operating profit margin is a measurement of the proportion of a company’s revenue that is left over after paying for production costs such as raw materials, salaries and administrative costs. Net profit margin is arrived at by deducting non operating expenses such as depreciation, finance costs and taxes out of operating profit and shows what is left for the shareholders as a percentage of net sales. Together these ratios help in understanding the cost and profit structure of the firm and analysing business inefficiencies.

Key Balance Sheet Figures

Sources of Funds / Liabilities (Rs. Cr)
Particulars FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 
Share Capital 472.63 472.63 439.63 456.25 423.99 
Reserves & Surplus 2,587.96 2,729.09 2,551.16 2,650.74 2,197.55 
Money received against share warrants 172.90
Net worth (shareholders funds) 3,060.59 3,201.72 2,990.79 3,284.65 2,794.43 
Minority Interest 528.34 673.52 681.01 609.16 745.11 
Long term borrowings 8,054.35 11,163.21 11,708.04 15,849.23 16,920.29 
Current liabilities 5,216.99 4,779.71 6,000.86 4,503.67 6,272.21 
Other long term liabilities and provisions 266.31 332.28 437.88 203.78 229.59
Deferred Tax Liabilities 17.55 22.73 6.59 10.72 13.63 
Total Liabilities 17,144.13 20,173.16 21,825.17 24,461.21 26,975.26 

 

Application of Funds / Assets (Rs. Cr)
Particulars FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 
Fixed Assets 11,476.07 15,287.77 17,164.46 19,219.17 19,840.54 
Noncurrent Investments 21.58 21.58 21.58 21.58 127.50 
Current assets 3,673.57 3,205.34 3,185.63 3,419.40 4,608.77 
Long term advances and other noncurrent assets 1,865.94 1,467.38 1,121.42 999.49 1,451.82 
Deferred Tax Assets 106.97 191.09 332.07 801.57 946.62 
Goodwill on consolidation (net) – 
Total assets 17,144.13 20,173.16 21,825.17 24,461.21 26,975.26 

Efficiency Analysis

 
Particulars FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 
ROCE 5.72 5.44 3.49 2.48 7.78 
ROE / RONW 4.91 5.23 (5.45) (9.75) (17.67) 

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) measures a company’s profitability from its overall operations by calculating the return generated on the total capital invested in the business (i.e. equity + debt). Return on Equity (ROE) or Return on Net Worth (RONW) measures the amount of profit which the company generates on money invested by the equity shareholders. In short, ROE draws attention to the return generated by the shareholders on their investment in the business. Together these ratios can be used in comparing the profitability of the company with other companies in the same industry.

Valuation Analysis

Consolidated
Particulars FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Total Income from Operations (Rs. Cr.) 2,207.02 2,111.80 2,380.43 4,360.31  3,938.58 
Growth (%) 13.32 % (4.31 %) 12.72 % 83.17 %  (9.67 %) 
PAT (Rs. Cr.) 167.35 (188.09 %) (369.52) (493.87)  (692.75) 
Growth (%) 11.34 % (212.39 %) –  – 
Earnings Per Share – Basic (Rs. ) 3.79 (4.62) (8.01) (10.80)  (15.00)
Earning Per Share – Diluted (Rs. ) 3.79 (4.62) (8.01) (10.80)  (15.00)
Price to Earnings 11.19 – 

Dividend History

The Company has not declared any dividend over the last 5 financial years.

Liquidity and Credit Analysis

Current Ratio

Higher current ratio implies healthier short term liquidity comfort level. A current ratio below 1 indicates that the company may not be able to meet its obligations in the short run. However, it is not always a matter of worry if this ratio temporarily falls below 1 as many times companies squeeze out short term cash sources to achieve a capital intensive plan with a longer term outlook. KSK Energy’s average current ratio over the last 5 financial years has been 0.74 times.

Long Term Debt to Equity Ratio

Companies operating with high long term debt to equity on their balance sheets are vulnerable to economic cycles. In times of slowdown in economy, companies with high levels of debt find it increasingly difficult to service the interest on their borrowings as profit margins decline. We believe that long term debt to equity ratio higher than 0.6 – 0.8 could affect the business of a company and its results of operations.

KSK Energy’s average long term debt to equity ratio over the last 5 financial years has been 2.21 times which indicates that the Company operates with high level of debt and is not placed well to withstand economic slowdowns.

Interest Coverage ratio

Interest coverage ratio indicates the comfort with which the company may be able to service the interest expense (i.e. finance charges) on its outstanding debt. Higher interest coverage ratio indicates that the company can easily meet the interest expense pertaining to its debt obligations. In our view, interest coverage ratio of below 1.5 should raise doubts about the company’s ability to meet the expenses on its borrowings. Interest coverage ratio below 1 indicates that the company is just not generating enough to service its debt obligations.

KSK Energy’s average interest coverage ratio over the last 5 financial years has been 1.59 times which indicates that the Company can meet its debt obligations without any difficulty.

Ownership pattern

In its latest stock exchange filing dated 31 March 2017, KSK Energy reported a promoter holding of 57.83 %. Large promoter holding indicates conviction and sincerity of the promoters. We believe that a greater than 35 % promoter holding offers safety to the retail investors.

At the same time, institutional holding in the Company stood at 18.68 % (FII+DII). Large institutional holding indicates the confidence of seasoned investors. At the same time, it can also lead to high volatility in the stock price as institutions buy and sell larger stakes than retail participants.

About the Author

Rajat Sharma pictureRajat Sharma is a well known stock market analyst and commentator. He has covered Indian markets for over a decade and is regarded for consistently identifying early stage investment opportunities. Attorney by qualification, Rajat has done extensive work for improving corporate governance and disclosure standards.

 

Leave a Comment